Current:Home > FinanceSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Aspire Capital Guides
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-17 14:01:43
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (884)
Related
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Kim Kardashian Reveals the Meaningful Present She Gives Her 4 Kids Each Year on Their Birthdays
- Kids housed in casino hotels? It's a workaround as U.S. sees decline in foster homes
- Nevada’s Sunshine Just Got More Expensive and Solar Customers Are Mad
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Here's What's Coming to Netflix in June 2023: The Witcher Season 3, Black Mirror and More
- Donald Triplett, the 1st person diagnosed with autism, dies at 89
- Pfizer warns of a looming penicillin supply shortage
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- New U.S., Canada, Mexico Climate Alliance May Gain in Unity What It Lacks in Ambition
Ranking
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- McCarthy says he supports House resolutions to expunge Trump's impeachments
- Tourist subs aren't tightly regulated. Here's why.
- Inside Jeff Bezos' Mysterious Private World: A Dating Flow Chart, That Booming Laugh and Many Billions
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- Wildfire smoke is blanketing much of the U.S. Here's how to protect yourself
- Lily-Rose Depp and 070 Shake's Romance Reaches New Heights During Airport PDA Session
- Hepatitis C can be cured. So why aren't more people getting treatment?
Recommendation
Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
Wind Takes Center Stage in Vermont Governor’s Race
Miles Teller and Wife Keleigh Have a Gorgeous Date Night at Taylor Swift's Concert
'Hidden fat' puts Asian Americans at risk of diabetes. How lifestyle changes can help
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
It's never too late to explore your gender identity. Here's how to start
Colorado Settlement to Pay Solar Owners Higher Rates for Peak Power
Titan sub implosion highlights extreme tourism boom, but adventure can bring peril