Current:Home > MarketsHow did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown -Aspire Capital Guides
How did each Supreme Court justice vote in today's student loan forgiveness ruling? Here's a breakdown
View
Date:2025-04-13 08:46:10
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the Biden administration does not have the authority to wipe out nearly half-a-trillion dollars in student debt.
The decision denies relief to about 40 million Americans who stood to have up to $20,000 in student debt erased by the plan using the HEROES Act.
There were actually two student loan forgiveness decisions made on Friday: The first was about whether two private citizens had the right to challenge the plan. The court unanimously said that the pair did not have standing, and their challenge was thrown out.
- Read the full text of the decision
However, in the case where the decision to strike down the forgiveness plan was made, the court said that Missouri — one of six states that challenged the plan — did have legal standing. This allowed the court to consider whether the secretary of education could use the HEROES Act to forgive student loan debt.
Here's how the court voted on that case.
Supreme Court justices who voted against student loan forgiveness
The Supreme Court's decision fell along ideological lines, much like Thursday's decision to end race-based affirmative action.
Chief Justice John Roberts voted against the student loan forgiveness plan and delivered the majority opinion, saying that U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona has the authority to "waive or modify" the HEROES Act, but not "rewrite that statute from the ground up."
"The Secretary's comprehensive debt cancellation plan cannot fairly be called a waiver—it not only nullifies existing provisions, but augments and expands them dramatically. It cannot be mere modification, because it constitutes 'effectively the introduction of a whole new regime,'" Roberts wrote.
Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted with Roberts.
Barrett filed a concurring opinion, writing that the court "can uphold the Secretary of Education's loan cancellation program only if he points to 'clear congressional authorization' for it."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold student loan forgiveness
The court's three liberal voices — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — all opposed the decision. Kagan filed a dissent where she called the decision to take up the case, let alone vote on it, an "overreach."
"The plaintiffs in this case are six States that have no personal stake in the Secretary's loan forgiveness plan," Kagan wrote. "They are classic ideological plaintiffs: They think the plan a very bad idea, but they are no worse off because the Secretary differs. In giving those States a forum — in adjudicating their complaint — the Court forgets its proper role. The Court acts as though it is an arbiter of political and policy disputes, rather than of cases and controversies."
In the dissent, Kagan wrote that Cardona acted within the "broad authority" provided by the HEROES Act, saying that the decision to alter usual rules "fits comfortably within" the parameters set by the statute.
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Clarence Thomas
- Student Debt
- Student Loan
- Student Loans
- Ketanji Brown Jackson
- Miguel Cardona
- John Roberts
Kerry Breen is a news editor and reporter for CBS News. Her reporting focuses on current events, breaking news and substance use.
veryGood! (5934)
Related
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Mexico demands investigation into US military-grade weapons being used by drug cartels
- She began to panic during a double biopsy. Then she felt a comforting touch
- 20 Kitchen Products Amazon Can't Keep In Stock
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Criminals are extorting money from taxi drivers in Mexico’s Cancun, as they have done in Acapulco
- New study finds that multivitamins could help slow cognitive decline associated with aging
- Northern lights may be visible in more than a dozen states Monday night: Here's what to know
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Dave Eggers wins Newbery, Vashti Harrison wins Caldecott in 2024 kids' lit prizes
Ranking
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Families sue Kentucky gun shop that sold AR-15 used in 2023 bank shooting that killed 5
- 60 Missouri corrections officers, staffers urging governor to halt execution of ‘model inmate’
- Appeals court reverses judge’s ruling, orders appointment of independent examiner in FTX bankruptcy
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- US Supreme Court to hear case of Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip
- Oilers sign Corey Perry less than two months after Blackhawks terminated his contract
- New Hampshire investigating fake Biden robocall meant to discourage voters ahead of primary
Recommendation
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
Testy encounters between lawyers and judges a defining feature of Trump’s court cases so far
Stanford's Tara VanDerveer becomes winningest coach in major college basketball, passing Mike Krzyzewski
A 100 mph dash for life: Minnesota state troopers race to get heart to transplant recipient
Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
UWGB-Marinette to become latest 2-year college to end in-person instruction
Burton Wilde: First Principles Interpretation of FinTech & AI Turbo.
New Hampshire investigating fake Biden robocall meant to discourage voters ahead of primary